US bank examiners · continuity & third-party risk

Examiners want a resilience program you can run — not a binder you rebuild.

Community and regional banks carry the same operational-resilience expectations as the big institutions — business continuity, disaster recovery, third-party and core-provider oversight, and a tested incident-response plan — but with a fraction of the team. Examiners increasingly assess whether the program actually works: live, tested, and evidenced across every vendor and branch you depend on. Resilis makes the program real, keeps it current between exams, and runs the incident if one comes.

Resilience program status
AMBER — current

Continuity plan on paper · never tested · vendor evidence assembled on request

↓  with Resilis
GREEN — target

Live · dependency-mapped · tested · exam-ready

The gap between the two is what an examiner finds. Twenty minutes tells you which line you're on.
Find your bank's shape

Every bank carries the same expectations. What they cost you depends on how your bank is built.

Open the shape that fits — the answer is the part of Resilis built for it.

Workload reductionA lean team carries continuity, vendor risk and BSA all at once
What Resilis does

The platform acts as your program co-developer — it leverages what you already have, runs consistency checks across your plans, policies and procedures, and flags the gaps an examiner would. Your risk officer stops being the runbook, and a program refresh that used to take weeks takes days.

Tabletop & testingThe continuity plan exists — but it's never really been tested
What Resilis does

Resilis is built to run an incident, not just document one. A guided tabletop produces the cheapest credible evidence an examiner looks for — proof the plan was exercised, with a dated record to show for it. And if a real disruption comes, you run it from the same platform. That's the part the binder was never going to do.

Third-party & core-provider concentrationYour critical operations run on a handful of vendors
What Resilis does

Dependency and vendor mapping is native to the platform, not a spreadsheet you rebuild each year. It captures where your key operations actually run — your core provider, item processing, cloud, correspondent and fintech partners — so you map the whole operating model and stress-test it before something breaks. Third-party oversight evidence becomes something you pull on demand, in line with interagency guidance, not a project you reassemble each exam cycle.

Multi-branch & holding-company coordinationYour footprint spans branches, a holding company or affiliates
What Resilis does

The platform brings stakeholders together so the response spans your whole footprint — not just the branch where the disruption started, and with vendors and external partners inside it rather than a separate scramble. Technology, operations and the business stay naturally aligned, with the platform as challenger. When something happens, the response is co-orchestrated: you decide, while the platform proposes the next move based on your plans and the situation in front of you.

Two screens, not twenty features

The proof isn't a feature list. It's watching the program assemble itself.

YOUR BANK Core Item proc. Cloud Correspondent evidenced gap
Dependency & vendor map

The core, item processing, cloud and correspondent web assembling itself — each node carrying its own oversight evidence, with concentration and gaps flagged before an incident finds them.

CRISIS MODE · ACTIVE 36h REG NOTIFICATION 35:41:07 Scope confirmed · systems assessedOps Material impact determined · notify primary regulatorCISO Customer notification drafted · pending reviewCounsel Core-provider oversight evidence attachedOps LOGBOOK · every action dated, attributed, exportable
Crisis mode

The live operating picture during an incident — tasks, owners, the 36-hour regulator-notification clock running, every action written to a dated logbook. The program as something you run, not retrieve.

The honest before / after

A continuity program survives an exam two ways. Only one survives the next incident.

The binder approach

  • A document rebuilt annually, accurate the day it's filed and drifting after
  • Vendor and core-provider oversight reconstructed by hand each exam cycle
  • "Tested" means a meeting nobody recorded
  • One or two people hold the whole program in their heads
  • Evidence assembled under pressure, after the request arrives

The Resilis approach

  • A program that updates as your bank, vendors and branches change
  • Dependency map and oversight evidence generated continuously
  • "Tested" means a dated tabletop with a defensible record
  • The drafting and consistency work done by the platform, not your team
  • Exam-ready evidence available the moment it's asked for
Why trust a platform you haven't heard of yet

Built where the resilience rules are hardest — now mapped to yours.

CoverageAligned to how US bank examiners look at resilience

Resilis covers the operational-resilience core examiners focus on — business continuity and disaster recovery, third-party and core-provider oversight, incident response and testing, and the evidence behind them — in line with the FFIEC Business Continuity Management guidance and interagency third-party risk-management guidance. The same engine was built for Europe's NIS2 and DORA, so it is the operational-resilience layer that works alongside your controls for access, encryption, and the rest of your security stack.

Security postureThe substance is already here

Resilis runs on infrastructure independently certified to ISO 27001, HDS and PCI-DSS — encryption in transit and at rest, least-privilege access, strict tenant isolation, 24/7 monitoring, and daily backups with tested restoration. And Resilis runs separately, by design, from the systems it protects — so when your own environment is under attack, the platform coordinating the response is the one still standing.

ISO 27001 HDS PCI-DSS
A human, not a funnelYour first conversation is with an independent advisor

An independent advisor who works alongside Resilis on its US expansion — eighteen years in global-bank COO offices running regulatory remediation and Dodd-Frank implementation at regulated financial institutions. They've been on the side of the table that assembles the evidence when a regulator comes, and know what holds under that pressure. Not a compliance advisor, and this isn't compliance advice — an operator showing you how this evidence is typically examined.

Why now

The expectations on community and regional banks keep moving: sharper focus on business-continuity testing, third-party and core-provider concentration, and a computer-security incident-notification rule that gives you 36 hours to notify your primary federal regulator. A program that only exists on paper is fine until the exam — or the incident — is the moment it has to work. Getting ahead of the next review now is far cheaper than rebuilding under one.

Twenty minutes on what an examiner actually asks you to show.

Not a demo, and not a compliance assessment — a working session on evidence. A resilience program isn't examined on whether you have one; it's examined on what you can produce. You'll leave knowing which artifacts you could pull today and which you'd be reconstructing under pressure.

Book the review